Kleja vs Hijazi Maamoul
Both dishes use the same 100 g basis. This compares the published standardized recipes; it is not an absolute judgment about which dish is “healthier.”
| Nutrient | Kleja | Ma'amoul Hijazi |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 389 kcal | 484 kcal |
| Protein | 10.8 g | 6.6 g |
| Fat | 12.9 g | 25.5 g |
| Carbohydrate | 62 g | 60 g |
| Fiber | 9.4 g | 5.7 g |
| Sodium | 157 mg | 50 mg |
| Potassium | 351 mg | 306 mg |
| Iron | 2.31 mg | 3.2 mg |
Compare the amounts you actually plan to eat
Enter an independent weight for each dish. Values are scaled linearly from the published 100 g data and do not correct for recipe differences.
Kleja
Ma'amoul Hijazi
| Nutrient | Kleja | Ma'amoul Hijazi |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 389 kcal | 484 kcal |
| Protein | 10.8 g | 6.6 g |
| Fat | 12.9 g | 25.5 g |
| Carbohydrate | 62 g | 60 g |
| Fiber | 9.4 g | 5.7 g |
| Sodium | 157 mg | 50 mg |
| Potassium | 351 mg | 306 mg |
| Iron | 2.31 mg | 3.2 mg |
Change either weight to compare unequal portions. “Not available” means the reference did not report that value for the selected recipe.
What can you conclude?
Use the tables to understand the numerical difference. Portion size, ingredients and preparation can make your actual dish different from the standardized recipe.
Source: Saudi Food Composition Tables — Kleja p. 141, Ma'amoul Hijazi p. 77. Official source ↗